Current Issues Index |
Archives |
Abuse/Justice |
Assisted Living Index |
Closures |
Culture Change News |
Economic Stimulus |
General Issues |
Health Care Information |
Health Issues Index |
Norovirus |
Flu Vaccine Distribution |
Flu Update October 2004 |
Flu Season |
HIPAA |
Memo to Ombudsmen |
Medicare Part D Index |
Medicare ODF |
Olmstead Index |
Importance of Olmstead |
Implementing Olmstead |
The Olmstead Decision |
Staffing Issues |
New Posting Requirement |
Carbonell Nominated |
Waxman Briefing on Abuse |
Letters of Support for Study on Sexual Abuse, August 2001 |
Appropriations Bill Dec. 20, 2001 |
Response to GAO Report Mar 4, 2002 |
Senate Hearing March 4, 2002 |
Zimmerman: MDS QIs |
Kaplan: New Tool |
NORS Training Materials |
Conference Calls |
NORS Registration List |
NORS Part Two |
QI Reports: Caution |
Quality Campaign |
Quality Forum Update |
QI Index Page |
HI Ombudsman Quoted |
MS and ME Ombudsmen Interviewed |
Ombudsman and QIO Roles |
ORC Advice |
HHS News Release on NHQI |
Elder Abuse |
AbuseTestimony Oct 30, 2003 |
Hill Event May 9, 2002 |
Elder Justice Proposal |
Elder Justice Act |
Call for Co-Sponsors |
Hirschel Presentation |
Wood Presentation |
NASUA Transmittal Letter Nov. 8, 2002 |
Pain Management |
CAC Initiative |
CMP Funds |
Councils |
QIO Mediation |
Natural Disasters Index |
Emergency Procedures |
Hurricane Prep |
Emergency Preparedness |
Mental Health |
News Stories |
NASUA Toolkit |
Nursing Home Transition Diversion |
New Posting Requirement New Posting Requirement
On
January 1, 2003, Nursing Homes Must
Begin Posting Their Nurse
Staffing Levels “In a Clearly Visible Place" on Every Shift
(printable pdf
version of NCCNHR press release)
On January 1, 2003, all nursing homes that participate in
Medicare and Medicaid will be required to begin posting “in a clearly visible
place” the number of nursing staff on duty on each shift. Those who must be
included in the daily posting are:
- Registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and
nurse aides directly responsible for
resident care.
The requirement was enacted as Section 941of the 2000
Benefits Improvement and Protection Act (BIPA). If properly monitored and
enforced, the law will be a strong tool to help residents, families, consumer
groups, and ombudsmen monitor staffing adequacy, quality of care, and compliance
with state and federal staffing requirements. Please alert and educate others
– residents, families, consumer advocates, local ombudsmen, community and
professional groups with an interest in nursing homes, and workers – about
this provision.
Making the Law Work
to Improve Quality Care
Several shortcomings in the law and the government’s
sluggish enforcement have created the need for consumer advocates to take extra
steps to assure that its intent is met:
- The law does
not require separate posting for each unit. Consumers may have to do
their own count to determine how many nursing staff are actually available
to care for residents in different sections or wings of the facility. Ask
the administrator or director of nursing to post the information on each
unit. Also, although the law does not require it, you may want to ask for
the names of the staff on duty to
be posted. This information will help residents and families keep track of
who is working on a shift.
- It does not
require the facility to post how many residents
are in the facility or on each unit at the time the numbers are posted.
Therefore, consumers should get a count of residents so they can calculate
staffing ratios. NCCNHR recommends a minimum of one direct caregiver
(including nurses and nursing assistants) to five residents on the day
shift; one to 10 on the evening shift; and one to 15 on the night shift.
Research has affirmed that at lower levels, residents cannot get quality
care. If your state has minimum staffing requirements, determine whether the
facility is meeting them.
- The Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services directed state survey agencies in an October
10 memorandum to verify that the information has been posted – but it says
that “at this time” surveyors do not have to audit whether it is
accurate. This affirms the importance of consumer advocates monitoring
the accuracy of the posted numbers. We suggest that if you find inaccurate
information displayed, you discuss your concern with the administrator or
director of nursing. If you still feel that the posted numbers are wrong and
that the facility is not willing to correct its reports, file a complaint
with the state survey agency. Regardless of CMS’s inaction, Congress did
not intend for consumers to be given inaccurate information.
Further Guidance
Needed
In the October memorandum to state survey agencies, CMS
said it will develop further guidance on the law’s requirement that the
information be displayed in a “uniform manner.” The memo does not address
several “significant issues” singled out by Senators Charles Grassley (R-IA)
and John Breaux (D-LA) in a letter to CMS Administrator Tom Scully in August. (Read
letter here) The senators said facilities should receive federal guidance on
issues “such as separate reporting for agency personnel, a clear definition of
‘direct responsibility’ for resident care, and how to present staffing data
in a way that makes the presentation most useful for residents, families, and
members of the public.” Clearly these questions and others need clarification,
and NCCNHR will continue to work with the senators’ offices and CMS to get
clarification through regulations and guidelines.*
In the meantime, remember that the law is a minimum
requirement. Facilities can do more, and states can require more.
* S. 2879, a
bill introduced by Grassley, Breaux and Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) would
require nursing homes to file their nurse staffing information in quarterly
reports to CMS that the state would audit for accuracy. CMS would report the
data on Nursing Home Compare. The bill was attached to the Senate’s
“Medicare giveback” package, which would restore some Medicare funds for
skilled nursing facilities that lapsed October 1 (as well as funds for doctors
and other Medicare providers). The giveback bill did not pass the Senate in
2002, and its fate – along with the staffing provision – is uncertain as
this is being written in December 2002.
|